Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Four pedagogy’s of Anderson and our life.


The knowledge we have might fill few books, but the knowledge we don’t have may fill few libraries. I don’t know who said it, but I remember as once my father told me. The important thing he told me was the statement came just after that.

He said that, till the last breath of our life, we are student and the best way to learn is accept the fact or truth that every creature on this earth has something to offer as knowledge. It is up to us how and when we find that truth – knowledge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitruvian_Man
The four pedagogy – (paidos - child and ago – lead, means leading a child, in Greek language) of Anderson have very distinct notions of ‘Truth’ – its nature, where it resides and how it might be expressed.

In one of the ‘New ‘Classical (neo-Aristotelian Pedagogy), the knowledge or truth is conceived, without scrutinizing the missing premise on which the argument is based.

He must be socialist, because he favours Graduated Income Tax. And many more of such statement people make where the conclusion is without scrutinizing the missing premises.


‘It is from Cadbury, it got to be good’ my son says quite often whenever he wants a chocolate from Cadbury. A very classic example or arriving to strong conclusion – establishing truth.

With the modes of Discourse Pedagogy, the writer becomes more a detective and supports the truth with various facts and findings to the truth.

Usually the lecturer or teacher will recognize the methods of arrangement: narration, description, exposition, and argumentation. Every style might be additionally categorised into sub-modes; for case, discussion might comprise relate and divergence, or reason and outcome.

‘The acid will burn.’ The statement heard in 5th form a science teacher was so sharply carved in mind, that even the most diluted and medically purified one was scary at first instance in medical lab.

With Process (neo-Platonic) Pedagogy the fact or reality is considered as ideal rather than material. The truth exists in human psyche. The presenter consequently pursues truth through self-examination.

The process approach to teaching writing makes use of free-writing and pre-writing drills so that the essayist can compose the way in the direction of the truth that he or she is chasing (but can never moderately prompt).

Actually, language is challenging in process pedagogy as it fit in to the material territory and so cannot sufficiently characterize the idyllic.

As an alternative of objective, representational language, the process approach emphasizes the importance of the individual voice. Voice personalizes the exploration of an idea, privileging individual perception over any objective truth.

The process approach has its paybacks. Paramount, it roots the proprietorship of writing exactly where it belongs: with the student. Next, it explains students to reflect further intensely around a topic as they move through the various pre-writing, writing, and revision processes.

Nothing like the aforementioned three methodologies to teaching composition, the epistemic approach debates that truth does not exist apart from language. Relatively, truth is made by language. The action of text writing is a truth-producing (or, if you like, a meaning-making) process.

Based on an educational model, which assumes that the learning process is an interactive process of seeking understanding, consisting of three fundamental components: 

The e learning and pedagogy.

Conceptualization, Construction and Dialogue, the Pedagogy is motivated on enabling learning and intellectual growth of students in contrast to instruction that treats students as the object of curriculum implementation.

http://img.scoop.it/
Effective learning pedagogy necessitates teachers to realise how students learn and must have the aptitude and independence to design, implement and assess educational activities that meet the needs of individual and all students.

E-learning pedagogy is one that not only integrates learning pedagogy, but goes further than it to take account of a profounder study into the fusion of instructional strategies that take into account of real-time personalized learning content-to-learner adaptability.

It is vital to note that the projected e-learning pedagogy should not anticipate signifying the full range of multifaceted jobs that include teaching; relatively, it must signify instructional events that promote lively student learning in the context of e-learning.

It will emphasis on the misuse of information technologies to acclimatize to the fluctuating learning circumstances and diverse student requirements. 

No comments:

Post a Comment