The knowledge we have
might fill few books, but the knowledge we don’t have may fill few libraries. I
don’t know who said it, but I remember as once my father told me. The important
thing he told me was the statement came just after that.
He said that, till the last
breath of our life, we are student and the best way to learn is accept the fact
or truth that every creature on this earth has something to offer as knowledge.
It is up to us how and when we find that truth – knowledge.
![]() |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitruvian_Man |
In one of the ‘New ‘Classical
(neo-Aristotelian Pedagogy)’, the knowledge or truth is conceived, without
scrutinizing the missing premise on which the argument is based.
‘It is from Cadbury,
it got to be good’ my son says quite often whenever he wants a chocolate from Cadbury.
A very classic example or arriving to strong conclusion – establishing truth.
With the modes of Discourse Pedagogy, the writer
becomes more a detective and supports the truth with various facts and findings
to the truth.
Usually the lecturer or teacher will
recognize the methods of arrangement: narration, description, exposition, and
argumentation. Every style might be additionally categorised into sub-modes;
for case, discussion might comprise relate and divergence, or reason and outcome.
‘The acid will burn.’ The statement heard
in 5th form a science teacher was so sharply carved in mind, that
even the most diluted and medically purified one was scary at first instance in
medical lab.
With Process
(neo-Platonic) Pedagogy the fact or reality is considered as ideal rather than
material. The truth exists in human psyche. The presenter
consequently pursues truth through self-examination.
The process approach to teaching writing
makes use of free-writing and pre-writing drills so that the essayist can compose
the way in the direction of the truth that he or she is chasing (but can never moderately
prompt).
Actually, language is challenging in
process pedagogy as it fit in to the material territory and so cannot sufficiently
characterize the idyllic.
As an alternative of objective,
representational language, the process approach emphasizes the importance of
the individual voice. Voice personalizes the exploration of an idea,
privileging individual perception over any objective truth.
The process approach has its paybacks. Paramount,
it roots the proprietorship of writing exactly where it belongs: with the
student. Next, it explains students to reflect further intensely around a topic
as they move through the various pre-writing, writing, and revision processes.
Nothing like the aforementioned three methodologies
to teaching composition, the epistemic
approach debates that truth does not exist apart from language. Relatively,
truth is made by language. The action of text writing is a truth-producing (or,
if you like, a meaning-making) process.
Based on an educational model, which
assumes that the learning process is an interactive process of seeking understanding,
consisting of three fundamental components:
The e learning and pedagogy.
Conceptualization, Construction and
Dialogue, the Pedagogy is motivated
on enabling learning and intellectual growth of students in contrast to
instruction that treats students as the object of curriculum implementation.
![]() |
http://img.scoop.it/ |
E-learning pedagogy is
one that not only integrates learning pedagogy, but goes further than it to take
account of a profounder study into the fusion of instructional strategies that
take into account of real-time personalized learning content-to-learner
adaptability.
It is vital to note
that the projected e-learning pedagogy should not anticipate signifying the
full range of multifaceted jobs that include teaching; relatively, it must signify
instructional events that promote lively student learning in the context of
e-learning.
It will emphasis on
the misuse of information technologies to acclimatize to the fluctuating
learning circumstances and diverse student requirements.
No comments:
Post a Comment